AutoGen
Microsoft's multi-agent conversation framework (autogen-agentchat). Now in maintenance mode as it merges into the unified Microsoft Agent Framework targeting Q1 2026 GA.
open-source
Build with AutoGenadvanced
Specialized AI teams for complex workflows.
Single-agent systems break down for complex tasks that require specialist knowledge across multiple domains. One agent cannot be expert at research, coding, analysis, and communication simultaneously, leading to shallow results on multi-step workflows.
Design a system of dedicated specialist agents with defined roles, shared context via a memory layer, orchestration contracts for handoffs, and deterministic arbitration when agents produce conflicting recommendations.
Design agent role map
Define each specialist agent's responsibility, input/output contracts, and interaction boundaries. Keep roles narrow and non-overlapping.
Tip: Start with 2-3 agents maximum. Add specialists only when you can measure the quality gap a new role would fill.
Build shared memory layer
Create a structured context store (Redis + Postgres) that all agents read from and write to. Define the schema for handoff context between agents.
Tip: Define a measurable success metric and review weekly to improve quality and cost.
# Shared memory for multi-agent handoffs
class AgentMemory:
def __init__(self, session_id: str):
self.redis = Redis() # Fast session state
self.pg = Postgres() # Durable context log
async def handoff(self, from_agent: str, to_agent: str, context: dict):
await self.redis.set(f'{self.session_id}:current', to_agent)
await self.pg.insert('handoffs', {**context, 'from': from_agent, 'to': to_agent})Define orchestration contracts
Specify when and how agents hand off work. Use structured output schemas to ensure receiving agents get the context they need.
Implement arbitration logic
When agents disagree, apply deterministic rules: prefer the specialist for their domain, use confidence scores to break ties, or escalate to a human decision-maker.
Instrument cost and quality metrics
Measure token usage, latency, and output quality per agent role. Identify which agents add value and which can be consolidated.
Microsoft's multi-agent conversation framework (autogen-agentchat). Now in maintenance mode as it merges into the unified Microsoft Agent Framework targeting Q1 2026 GA.
open-source
Build with AutoGenMulti-agent platform with open-source framework and Agent Management Platform (AMP). Visual editor, AI copilot, and enterprise deployment used by 60% of Fortune 500.
freemium
Build with CrewAILlama 4 Scout and Maverick with 10M token context, native multimodality, and mixture-of-experts architecture. Open-weight for self-hosting or API access.
self-hosted-or-api
Build with LlamaIn-memory data store with Vector Sets (Redis 8 preview) for native vector search, semantic caching, JSON document storage, and session management for AI agents.
open-source-or-cloud
Build with RedisOpen-source vector engine with built-in Weaviate Agents (Query, Transformation, Personalization), Hybrid Search 2.0, and multi-tenant architecture.
open-source-or-cloud
Build with WeaviateUse multi-agent when tasks require 3+ distinct skill domains, when quality improves with specialization, or when different steps need different LLM models.
CrewAI AMP and LangGraph are the leading options. CrewAI excels at role-based teams; LangGraph offers fine-grained stateful graph orchestration.
Use LangSmith or Helicone for per-agent tracing. Log every handoff with full context. Add a 'replay' capability to re-run specific agent interactions.
Costs multiply with agent count. Expect $300-$1,200/month for a 3-5 agent system, primarily driven by LLM API calls per agent step.
Engineering teams spend 20-30% of their review cycle on repetitive style, security, and performance checks that could be automated. At scale, manual reviews become a bottleneck that slows deployment velocity.
Open GuideResearchers spend 3-5 hours filtering through sources, cross-referencing claims, and organizing conclusions for a single research question. Manual synthesis is error-prone, sources get lost, and findings are hard to reproduce.
Open GuideTeams run 10-20 fragmented automations across Zapier, spreadsheets, and manual processes. Duplicate triggers fire, errors cascade silently, and no one has visibility into end-to-end workflow health.
Open Guide