Chroma
Open-source vector database (Apache 2.0) with Rust-core engine delivering 4x faster queries, serverless cloud with full-text search, and database forking.
open-source-or-cloud
Build with Chromaadvanced
Consistent extraction and metadata tagging without manual overhead.
Organizations process thousands of documents monthly in mixed formats (PDF, scans, emails, images). Manual classification and data extraction introduces 5-15% error rates, 2-3 day processing delays, and scales linearly with headcount.
Create a parser pipeline with OCR fallback for scanned documents, LLM-powered field extraction with structured outputs, confidence scoring per field, and automated routing based on document type and compliance needs.
Define extraction schema per document type
Map required fields, data types, and validation rules for each document category (invoices, contracts, forms, reports).
Tip: Define a measurable success metric and review weekly to improve quality and cost.
# Schema definition for invoice extraction
invoice_schema = {
'vendor_name': {'type': 'string', 'required': True},
'total_amount': {'type': 'number', 'required': True},
'line_items': {'type': 'array', 'items': {'description': 'string', 'amount': 'number'}}
}Build OCR and ingestion pipeline
Handle scanned files, low-quality images, and handwritten content with OCR. Mistral OCR 3 handles handwriting at $2/1K pages.
Tip: Pre-process scanned images with deskewing and contrast enhancement before OCR to improve extraction accuracy by 15-20%.
Classify document type
Route each document through a classifier to determine type, required extraction schema, and compliance handling rules.
Extract structured fields
Use LLM with structured output mode to extract fields per the schema. Attach confidence scores to each extracted value.
Validate and persist metadata
Cross-check extracted values against business rules, flag low-confidence fields for human review, and store results in your database.
Open-source vector database (Apache 2.0) with Rust-core engine delivering 4x faster queries, serverless cloud with full-text search, and database forking.
open-source-or-cloud
Build with ChromaCost-efficient models including Devstral 2 for agentic coding, Magistral for reasoning, and Mistral OCR 3 for document processing at low per-token pricing.
usage-based
Build with MistralGPT-5.2 and o-series reasoning models with the Responses API, AgentKit, and built-in tools for web search, code execution, and computer use.
usage-based
Build with OpenAIServerless vector database with integrated inference (embed + store + query in one call), Pinecone Assistant for managed RAG, and dedicated read nodes.
usage-based
Build with PineconePostgres backend with built-in pgvector for vector search, hybrid search (BM25 + vector), auth, real-time subscriptions, edge functions, and row-level security.
freemium
Build with SupabasePDF, images (JPG/PNG), Word docs, scanned documents, and email attachments. OCR handles non-digital formats. Mistral OCR 3 also handles handwritten content.
Modern LLMs achieve 90-98% field extraction accuracy on clean documents. Scanned and handwritten documents typically reach 85-95% with good OCR preprocessing.
OCR costs $2-3 per 1,000 pages (Mistral OCR 3). LLM extraction adds $0.01-0.05 per page depending on complexity. Total: $180-$600/month for 10K-50K pages.
Yes, with proper routing rules. Tag documents by compliance category (HIPAA, SOX, GDPR) and apply appropriate extraction and storage controls per category.
Internal knowledge is scattered across Notion, Confluence, Google Drive, and Slack. Employees spend 20% of their week searching for information, and answers are inconsistent because no one knows which document is the current source of truth.
Open GuideSupport teams handle 60-80% of tickets that are repetitive FAQs, draining agent time and creating inconsistent responses. As ticket volume scales, hiring linearly is unsustainable and new agents take weeks to ramp up on product knowledge.
Open GuideTeams lose 30% of meeting decisions to poor note-taking. Action items go unassigned, follow-ups slip through cracks, and attendees spend 15 minutes post-meeting writing recaps instead of executing on outcomes.
Open Guide